This panel discussion explores art prints as a viable asset class, focusing on their investment potential and the debate surrounding their classification as financial assets. The conversation highlights the division within the art world on whether prints should be treated similarly to traditional financial investments. The session brings together industry experts who provide insights from legal, financial, and collecting perspectives, offering a well-rounded discussion on the topic.
The panel features Simon Chadwick, a partner at Mishcon de Reya specialising in art and cultural property law, offering a legal perspective on art as an investment, and Anna Oerter, a collectibles manager who discusses market trends and investor behaviour. As well as prints & editions specialist Jasper Tordoff. They explore key factors such as valuation, liquidity, and historical appreciation of prints, while also addressing the risks and misconceptions associated with treating art as an asset class. The discussion underscores that, while prints can serve as an accessible entry point into art investment, they require careful consideration regarding authenticity, provenance, and market volatility.
A recurring theme is the lack of universal consensus on whether prints should be classified as financial assets. While some view them as stable, tangible investments, others argue that their value is inherently subjective and driven by market trends rather than financial fundamentals. The panellists also touch on portfolio diversification, emphasising that art prints can complement other investment vehicles if approached strategically.
The discussion concludes with predictions about the future of print investing, noting a growing interest from both seasoned collectors and new investors. The panellists stress the importance of education and due diligence when entering the market and encourage potential investors to consider prints not just for their financial potential but also for their cultural and aesthetic value.